Sample dashboard · Example only. Every name, number, and observation here is fabricated sample data, not real safety records. Read-only: nothing you do is saved.

Explore a live safety dashboard

This is exactly what a safety manager sees, a live product loaded with realistic sample inspection data so you can explore every feature before you commit. Click around: switch the time window, sort and filter the findings, and open the Aegis Intelligence™ tab. Look for the (i) bubbles to see how each piece works.

All data shown is fabricated sample data for demonstration. It is not real safety data from any company.

Time windowsFindings registerRead-only tour
Weekly safety briefing
Candid intelligence for leadership — week of Aug 3, 2026. Private to managers; the inspector-facing toolbox talk is the crew-safe translation.

Bottom line

A strong reporting week. 14 inspections across the active sites surfaced a 6.1% at-risk rate, in line with the 30-day average, and crews logged 6 good catches: hazards caught and corrected before anyone was exposed. The one signal worth a closer look is respiratory protection, which drove the largest share of at-risk findings again this week and should be validated, not assumed.

What's trending

  • Respiratory protection drove the most at-risk findings this week (16% of answered respirator checks). For asbestos work this is non-negotiable. N95s are never acceptable and fit-tested P100s are the minimum (OSHA 1910.134 / 1926.1101). Worth confirming fit-test currency before the next removal phase.
  • Negative-pressure loss appeared on several containment checks at the Capitol Hill School Abatement. Each was logged with a photo and corrected the same shift, the reporting loop working as intended.
  • Permit and documentation gaps showed up on a handful of morning starts. Not a hazard on the floor, but an audit exposure if a third party asks for records.

Risks to watch

  1. Respiratory protection is the item to validate, not wait on. It has been the largest at-risk theme two windows running. A quick fit-test audit and refresher beats letting the pattern harden.
  2. Containment integrity at the Capitol Hill School Abatement. Negative-pressure readings dipped on several checks; each was caught and fixed, but recurring dips near an occupied building warrant a supervisor walk this week.

Inspector highlights

Marcus Bell logged the most good catches this week — hazards surfaced and corrected early, which is exactly what keeps incidents from happening. Sofia Rojas covered the most ground of the field crew, logging the most inspections. Recognizing this is how careful reporting becomes the norm rather than the exception.

as of Aug 6, 2026, 1:57 PM · 24-hour cache

Organization safety health

needs attention
36/100
  • Engagement100
  • Hazard exposure0
  • Trend47
  • Resolution26
  • Reporting quality17
This period, in one read

Over 30 days the AT RISK rate is 6.4% (145 of 2,278 answered, 61 inspections; 56 needs-review, 17 good catches). Respiratory protection is the dominant and increasing signal (21.7%): repeated expired-cartridge entries may indicate a program gap, and OSHA 1910.134/1926.1101 expect valid P100 cartridges and enforced change schedules. Containment breach, negative pressure loss, and permit/documentation gaps are each increasing; one signal shows teardown beginning while final clearance results were still pending, which Reg 8 §III.P expects to precede any teardown. Prioritize validating top signals, respiratory practices, and the rising containment-breach pattern.

as of Aug 6, 2026, 1:57 PM14/14 inspectors reporting58 inspections

A health read of your safety reporting — every figure is a review signal, never a verdict on a person.

Inspections
58
7% vs earlier this period2164 answered responses
AT RISK %
6.6%
7% vs earlier this periodof answered responses
AT RISK per 100
246.6
19% vs earlier this periodfindings per 100 inspections
Meaningful comments
371
after placeholder cleanup
Needs Review
103
soft flags, not findings
Good Catch
37
hazards caught and controlled
Trend
Hazard themes
Serious-Exposure (PSIF) Themes
Rare-but-Serious
Comment Review
Inspectors
Sites
Field questions, what crews are asking
Management focus
Data confidence & coverage